• Abstract

The Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA) has been subjected to heated debate, nationally and internationally. This legal research paper delves into AFSPA’s legal framework by critically evaluating its historical context, operational efficiency, and multidimensional implications on numerous dimensions—human rights, socio-political environment, and economic growth. Post-Partition AFSPA was enacted in Assam and Manipur to tackle insurgency challenges by granting special powers to the Armed forces. This paper also addresses the allegations of human rights violations and abuse of excess power by security personnel as reported by different civil societies and human rights groups. It then explores the legal judgments by Indian Courts concerning AFSPA, making a comparison with similar overseas laws and examining the impacts on communities affected by this Act. The paper sheds light on significant debates surrounding the Act and finally proposes a few recommendations, calling for a reformed legislative framework with amendments to the Act’s propositions to balance national security with human rights protection and promote economic development with a more humane security law in India. The objective is to provide a balanced analysis of AFSPA’s role in India’s security framework and suggest reforms to escalate its virtue while safeguarding human rights.  

Keywords: Armed Forces, AFSPA, disturbed areas, law, militancy, security personnel

• Introduction 

The Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act (AFSPA), enacted in 1958, provides special powers to the armed forces in those regions that have been categorized as ‘disturbed areas’ with the commitment to maintaining public order and suppressing insurgency. Initially ingrained in a British colonial ordinance from 1942, intended to crush the Quit India Movement, AFSPA’s bequest has grown exponentially. Post-independence, it was re-enacted to discourse interior threats to security due to Partition, particularly in Assam and Manipur. The present-day framework of the Act as passed in 1958, expands its scope to inculcate regions affected by insurgencies, especially the North-eastern part of the country and later in J&K in 1990. AFSPA sanctions the military to arrest without warrants, conduct operations, and use deadly force while ensuring legal immunity to its personnel. It is a subject of considerable debate and analysis within the context of India’s legal and political landscape, for it has been supported as well as criticized for alleged violations of human rights. 

This legal research paper will assess the impact of AFSPA’s provisions on human rights, conflict resolution, and security issues. The paper will ascertain which clauses of the Act have been controversial and suggest possible remedial solutions to help the sufferers get better. To address these questions, the paper employs a multi-dimensional methodology, by reviewing existing literature on AFSPA such as legal documents, and scholarly articles; case studies of areas that have been severely impacted (both positive and negative) by the enactment of AFSPA, and a comparative analysis with similar legislation in other countries to comprehend the implications on society and governance. This approach is aimed at providing a refined understanding of AFSPA’s role in India’s security gear and its influence on the fundamental rights of citizens hailing from ‘disturbed areas’. This paper aims to contribute to the unending discourse by examining the historical background, legal framework, and multifaceted arguments surrounding AFSPA, ultimately exploring potential pathways for reform and resolution.

Overview of AFSPA 

Under Section 3 of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958, which is a significant piece of legislation in India, the Indian Armed Forces are granted special authority and powers in regions declared ‘disturbed areas’ because of disputes or clashes between members belonging to different racial, religious, language or caste groups or communities. This Act was introduced with the dual aim of maintaining public order and suppressing insurgency or armed rebellion situations. As per this Act, armed forces have the command to restrict any gathering that includes five or more people in an area, and use force or even open fire upon giving due warning if the person(s) involved is breaching the law, arrest people without warrants and conduct searches without consent. One of the main objectives of the Act also includes providing necessary legal backing to the armed forces to conduct operations obligatory to maintain law and order and restore peace. Initially, the States were at authority to declare any region as ‘disturbed’ but in 1972 this power passed onto the Centre. This Act also has provisions to protect security forces from legal proceedings unless there is a preceding sanction from the Centre.

Click Here To Download The Paper